Evidence in interventional cardiology

PCI for STEMI is superior to thrombolysis, even when performed routinely after thrombolysis (NORDISTEMI). PCI is also beneficial in NSTEMI patients (TACTICS-TIMI-18, RITA-3). However, in stable coronary artery disease it is much more controversial; COURAGE showed no benefit for PCI over medical therapy, though FAME-2 may have shown some benefit.


The use of drug-eluting stents appears to reduce revasculuarisation versus bare-metal stents(HORIZONS-AMI), though due to late stent thrombosis dual-antiplatelet therapy is recommended. However, this may not need to be continued after 6 months (PRODIGY).


Radial access appears as effective as femoral access and also safer (RIVAL).


Trans-aortic valve insertion (TAVI) appears a viable option versus surgery in high-risk patients and those not suitable for surgery (PARTNER).


Renal denervation appears to drop office blood pressures by over 30 mmHg in those with drug-resistant hypertension, though ambulatory drops are more modest (Symplicity HTN-2).

Topic Therapy group Therapy Trial
Intervention Access Radial RIVAL
Antiplatelet cover Dual antiplatelet therapy PRODIGY
CAD (stable) 2-/3-VD (vs. CABG) ASCERT
3VD/LMS disease (vs. CABG) SYNTAX
MVD in DM vs. CABG FREEDOM
PCI (vs. medical therapy) COURAGE, FAME-2
T2DM - PCI vs OMT/CABG BARI-2D
Renal denervation Resistant hypertension Symplicity HTN-2, Symplicity HTN-3
STEMI Drug-eluting stents (vs. bare-metal) HORIZONS-AMI
PCI post-thrombolysis NORDISTEMI
PCI to non-culprit arteries PRAMI
Thrombus aspiration TAPAS
Stents Drug-eluting stents (1st generation) RAVEL, TAXUS-IV, COMPARE
Drug-eluting stents (2nd generation) COMPARE
TAVI Non-surgical AS patients PARTNER
Versus surgery in AS PARTNER
UA/NSTEMI PCI TACTICS-TIMI-18, RITA-3